Lo Hobbit diventerà un film...

I due studios MGM e New Line paiono essersi accordati per i diritti cinematografici del romanzo di J.R.R. Tolkien, Lo hobbit. Sarà quindi possibile la realizzazione del film, che sarà una sorta di prequel alla trilogia de Il signore degli anelli.
Duecento milioni di budget, e inizio delle riprese entro i prossimi due anni, produzione MGM insieme a New Line: non resta che sperare che al timone di regia torni Peter Jackson, che può certo dire la sua sulla saga di Tolkien. La buona notizia è che Jackson si è sempre dimostrato interessato al progetto.

Preso da multiplayer.it

Speriamo bene, e speriamo anche che sia Jackson a dirigerlo...

:D

ma a dire il vero io sapevo che jackson aveva sempre escluso di voler fare lo hobbit, bah

io avevo sentito che voleva realizzare un remake di King Kong (appunto) e poi occuparsi de "Lo Hobbit", si vedrà

io sapevo come blaze. peraltro, se jackson non si fa prendere la mano dall'epicita', credo che lo hobbit possa essere piu' adatto e riuscito. forse anche soltato perche' mi piace molto di piu' del signore degli anelli.

In realtà la MGM aveva i diritti di distribuzione, mentre la New Line quelli per fare il film. L'accordo non è ancora ufficializzato, cmq a breve si attendono aggiornamenti.

Come commento personale aggiungo che farà cagare peggio di Narnia un film su Lo Hobbit.

scimmia inc

nn sarà 1 film ma 2

http://www.badtaste.it/modules.php?n...ticle&sid=3894

e

http://www.badtaste.it/modules.php?n...ticle&sid=3901

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Faramjr

Come commento personale aggiungo che farà cagare peggio di Narnia un film su Lo Hobbit.

---

:thumbup: cmq a me Lo Hobbit ha fatto un po cacare come libro.

tra le altre cose ho preso il libro di narnia e di solito divoro i libri in qualche giorno..... è fermo a pagina 54 da tipo 2 mesi -.-'' sboccavo se leggevo ancora...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jiinn

tra le altre cose ho preso il libro di narnia e di solito divoro i libri in qualche giorno..... è fermo a pagina 54 da tipo 2 mesi -.-'' sboccavo se leggevo ancora...

---

:D sei andato piu avanti di me, io mi son fermato sulla 20ina di pagine! :point:

Lo hobbit e' nata come una favola per bambini,ma in se e' una bella storia (l'ho letto 2 volte ed e' MOLTO meno palloso di alcune parti di lotr)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kali

Lo hobbit e' nata come una favola per bambini,ma in se e' una bella storia (l'ho letto 2 volte ed e' MOLTO meno palloso di alcune parti di lotr)

---

so che molti mi uccideranno ma io lotr non riesco a leggerlo... troooooooooooooooooooooooooppo palloso.
lo hobbit mai provato

Potrebbe venire un bel lavoretto se non ci mette le mani la disney

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kali

Lo hobbit e' nata come una favola per bambini,ma in se e' una bella storia (l'ho letto 2 volte ed e' MOLTO meno palloso di alcune parti di lotr)

---

bhe e' vero, ma si ci mette mani peter jackson ( anche se in molti nn lo gradiscono come regista , e nn ne capisco il perche' ) verrebbe su film per niente male ..se lo dividono in 2 film pero' fanno na gran boiata imho ..

lo hobbit potenzialmente e' perfetto per un film... se realizzato con la cura riservata a lotr (intendo come soldi spesi, effetti speciali, costumi etc)..

per tutti quelli che qui non apprezzano lotr -> sparatevi :nod:

Lo hobbit è senza dubbio il libro di Tolkien che scorre + facile. Nato come una favola per bambini, è estremamente lineare come racconto.

A me personalmente è piaciuto molto, indispensabile leggerlo prima di leggere Lotr :)

chi dice che lotr è pesante perche nn passa più è solo per una questione di principio.

voglio dire è proprio grazie a quelle descrizioni dettagliate che riesci a immergerti completamente in ciò che dice, nel luogo, nel personaggio; è questa la bellazza dei libri di tolkien. cosi come il silmarillion.

al contrario dei libri nn descrittivi che si si leggono meglio, ma ti dicono il 10% di quello che ti dice lotr

silmarillion>>>>>lo hobbit e lotr :nod:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shub

silmarillion>>>>>lo hobbit e lotr :nod:

---

E qui te l'appoggio...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Faramjr

E qui te l'appoggio...

---

Se lo a la futura moglie :shocked:

Seee...vi garberebbe :D

solo ke fare un film sul silmarillion è praticamente impossibile :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Boroming

chi dice che lotr è pesante perche nn passa più è solo per una questione di principio.

---

Chi dice che lotr e' pesante e non passa piu' ha solo dei gusti diversi dai tuoi.

E de gustibus...

:)

ma soprattutto bilbo da vecchio deve rimanere lo stesso attore sennò cazzincul...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wayne

Chi dice che lotr e' pesante e non passa piu' ha solo dei gusti diversi dai tuoi.
E de gustibus...
:)

---

no il piacere o nn piacere del libro deriva al 90% dalla trama, la descritività (quindi "pesantenza") influisce minimamente... è solo una questione psicologica.

Perche se la trama piace e ce voglia di leggere quel libro la descritività aiuto a immaginare molto piu facilmente ed "entrare" nel libro

Da aicn.com

QUINT: I saw in Variety that THE HOBBIT came up. The MGM thing. Did you see this?


PETER JACKSON: Where the guy who runs MGM was announcing their tentpoles and saying they were doing TERMINATOR 4 and they want me to make 2 HOBBIT films? I was reading that this morning on the net. It's a rather strange thing to wake to. I'm up for it, but somebody should phone me because I'm getting a bit booked out at the moment!


Everybody asks me about THE HOBBIT, you know? But the reality is I've never had a conversation with anybody about it. Not one person has ever made a phone call to me. I don't know. The irony is that we're acquiring our own projects now and we're buying the rights to books. The reality is, to be quite honest with you, we're getting ourselves now nice and busy, in a good way, for the next 4 years. So, people have not (spoken to us) about THE HOBBIT and it's making it more and more impossible for us to be involved.


QUINT: So, if you got a phone call tomorrow telling you that you could have any budget you need and creative freedom, but it has to be finished and in theaters by December 2009. Would you find room for THE HOBBIT?


PETER JACKSON: Well, it depends. No one has phoned me, which is kind of weird, but I don't know. We're very, very excited and committed about the films that we're working on now, so I don't know. I'd have to sit down and look at it all. Obviously, I'm interested in THE HOBBIT, but right now we have no emotional investment in it. For the last few years, we have put our hearts into other projects. It would seem strange to have somebody else do it, although some part of me would be interested in going to see somebody else's HOBBIT, be able to buy my popcorn and go and sit and watch the film.


I'm not against that and if our schedule is impossible, then that's what they'll do. They'll certainly go and get someone else to make it. They won't wait, which is their right.


QUINT: Could your lawsuit against New Line be a problem?


PETER JACKSON: No. It's a seperate thing. I mean, I can't discuss the law suit, but it is just about rather dull audit issues, not people or projects. New Line called us about a Lord of the Rings box set a few weeks ago. A high definition one, so we are still talking.


QUINT: Maybe they will offer a settlement that includes The Hobbit.


PETER JACKSON: No. Well, they might, but we would never do that. Never. You make movies because you love the idea. You feel kind of emotionally driven. I would never commit to a 2 or 3 year project because of a court order! I mean, what a jinx. It would bring bad karma. No, our dull audit stuff can get figured out by lawyers or courts or whatever. We'll keep our movies completely untarnished by that.


QUINT: I think no matter what you should write some dialogue for Christopher Lee and pack up the robe, staff and beard and go film about 10 minutes with him playing Saruman again while you still have the chance!


PETER JACKSON: I would love to! If I was doing THE HOBBIT I'd try to get as many of the guys back as I could. I mean, there's actually a role for Legolas in THE HOBBIT, his father features in it, obviously Gandalf and Saruman should be part of it. There's things that you can do with THE HOBBIT to bring in some old friends, for sure. I have thought about it from time to time... Elrond, Galadriel and Arwen could all feature. Elves have lived for centuries. Part of the attraction would be working with old friends. I wouldn't want to do it unless we could keep a continuity of cast. I have zero interest in directing a Gandalf who wasn't Ian McKellen for instance. Strange to be even talking about it, for three years it's been in this rights situation limbo.


QUINT: They must have figured it out.


PETER JACKSON: It looks that way. I've always thought that New Line would go to MGM and offer them some money and basically buy them out, then New Line would make the film. But I can see what MGM is doing. If I was MGM I'd do the same thing. What MGM is gotta be saying is, "Well, we'll partner in the film with you. We'll pay for half of it and you pay for half of it and we'll share it." That's what studios do a lot with these films. If I was MGM, I'd think that was the smart thing to do. "We'll share the rights," and actually become a partner in what is already a successful franchise.


It must create problems for New Line because they have all these output deals with these independent guys, who did a great job releasing LORD OF THE RINGS in all the different (foreign) territories. They release a package of New Line films over 2 or 3 years and they get 20 films or whatever. And I'm sure that New Line would prefer to offer their partners 20 films plus THE HOBBIT as part of the package, so MGM might be taking domestic and New Line international. I really have no idea, but it's interesting to see how the politics works. That stuff intrigues me. They must have figured out something I guess. I mean, there's too much money involved. If I was the Time/Warner board, I would have been hassling New Line for a Hobbit film for the last three years! It's a billion dollar franchise for the studio.


QUINT: And I'm sure they'd love the idea of two HOBBIT films. Twice the box office, more DVDs to sell...


PETER JACKSON: I saw that. Yeah, we're supposed to be writing The Lovely Bones, but of course Phil, Fran and I read the thing on the net and spent most of this morning talking about The Hobbit. We think the two film idea is really smart. One of the problems with The Hobbit is that it is a fairly simple kids story, and doesn't really feel like The Lord of the Rings. Tonally I mean. It's always may be a little worried, but with two films that kinda gets easier. It allows for more complexity. At that implied stuff with Gandalf and the White Council and the return of Sauron could be fully explored.

That's what we talked about this morning. Taking The Hobbit and combining it with all that intigue about Sauron's rise, and the problems that has for Gandalf. It could be cool. That way, it starts feeling more like The Lord of the Rings and less like this kids book. You could even get into Gollum's sneaking into Mordor and Aragorn protecting The Shire. That's what we'd do. Love to work with Viggo again.


Anyway, we talked for a while and got back into the Lovely Bones. As I said, that's where our hearts are at the moment. We're extremely happy with the projects we're involved in now and we're busy for a few years. I really have no idea. If someone else makes it, I'll be first in line! Actually, I'd try to be, but Philippa is the Queen of the Geeks and she'd definately get there first!

Non c'è bisogno di altri commenti, come al solito la stampa nostrana dimostra un'incompetenza impressionante.