consigli cineteca

mi sta intrigando molto il genere alla the snatch, ho già

the snatch
slevin
smoking aces
lock & stock


che altri film del genere consigliate?

Revolver
Mean Machine
Layer Cake
E recentemente uscito al cinema In Bruges.

E togli smoking aces e slevin che non c'entrano niente :D

Controlla sempre il bollino, devono essere "made in England".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Faramjr

Revolver
Mean Machine
Layer Cake
E recentemente uscito al cinema In Bruges.

E togli smoking aces e slevin che non c'entrano niente :D

Controlla sempre il bollino, devono essere "made in England".

---

come nn c'entrano?
si vabbè the snatch e lock e stock sono più simili, ma intendevo anche per genere con intreccio strafigherrimo che alla fine "gli spettatori fanno ohhh"


edit: ah, ci deve essere vinnie jones, mi so visto pure eurtrip per vederlo hooligan :sneer:

No, quei film sono fatti tutti dalla stessa combriccola, Guy RItchie, Matthew Vaughn e altri, quindi hanno un certo stile e un certo registro. I film americani tipo slevin o shoot em up sono delle squallide imitazioni che non si avvicinano per niente agli "originali".

Smoking aces poi... una porcata indecente.

a me revolver non è piaciuto per niente :(:(:(
Anche se c'e' Stratham e ritchie alla regia.. l'ho trovato lentissimo :(:(:(
In Bruges è bellissimo invece!!!!:love::love:

mmmhh c'e' the Bank Job... che è simile per certi versi ma non del tutto..
c'e' stratham.. è un remake.. pero' a regia si rifa' per certi versi Snatch.

Si Revolver è di certo il peggiore. Ha voluto farlo troppo cerebrale e alla fine è rimasto con un pugno di sabbia in mano.

Peccato perchè c'è il personaggio di Mark Strong, Sorter che è >>> di qualsiasi cosa.

ngulo ma shoot em up fa proprio cacare!

The football factory ,se capisci bene l'inglese perchè vederlo in italiano nn ha senso :nod: un po' come lock &stock

mean machine molto carino, mo mi vedo sto bel revolver, a presto con commenti

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Taro Swarosky

ngulo ma shoot em up fa proprio cacare!

---

GG a non aver capito un film :point:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Va$h

GG a non aver capito un film :point:

---

Dimostra che il regista ha fatto centro :sneer::sneer::metal:

ma centro de che? sembravano le scene di filmato di un gioco tipo max payne

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Taro Swarosky

ma centro de che? sembravano le scene di filmato di un gioco tipo max payne

---

Deve essere forse visto proprio secondo questo animo?

No ma veramente, tu davvero ti aspettavi un Thriller? Dai non ci credo -_-°




Comunque, per rimanere in tema di film, anche se non è proprio un thriller ti consiglio "Prospettive di un delitto", ti fa veramente rimanere con la bava alla bocca dal primo all'ultimo minuto :drool:

bè considerate le richieste mi aspettavo consigli su thriller :look:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Faramjr

Revolver
Mean Machine
Layer Cake
E recentemente uscito al cinema In Bruges.

E togli smoking aces e slevin che non c'entrano niente :D

Controlla sempre il bollino, devono essere "made in England".

---

Altri film su questo genere che meritano di essere visti ?

Posso consigliarti qualcosa di italiano, L'odore della notte di Claudio Caligari e Arrivederci amore, ciao di Michele Soavi.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Faramjr

Posso consigliarti qualcosa di italiano, L'odore della notte di Claudio Caligari e Arrivederci amore, ciao di Michele Soavi.

---

basta che non sia del genere revolver, che sarà che l'ho visto di notte, ma non c'ho capito na sega :sneer:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Taro Swarosky

basta che non sia del genere revolver, che sarà che l'ho visto di notte, ma non c'ho capito na sega :sneer:

---

Quel film è tutta forma e niente sostanza, purtroppo. Ma secondo me va visto, perchè la forma spacca. Sorter mito.

Per gli amanti di Ritchie: cerchiate Halloween sul calendario, perchè il 31 ottobre uscirà il suo nuovo film (prodotto in usa, girato in uk :metal:) Rocknrolla. La nota positiva è che il film è un ritorno allo stile dei suoi film migliori, la nota negativa è che è stato "hollywoodizzato" e il film dovrebbe essere il primo di una trilogia.

Recensione per anglofoni:

Spoiler

Quote:

---

I saw ROCKNROLLA, and it kicked MIGHTY ARSE. And while it doesn’t have the shock of the new, I reckon this is the best of Guy Ritchie’s good movies. And that bar’s pretty damn high. I saw it in London, where it’s set, although the London of the film is totally Ritchiefied. We’re back in Lock Stock and Snatch territory (thank fuck), where everyone has a name like One-Two or Mumbles, and speaks a deranged mockney argot. Come to think of it, they did that in Revolver too, but here we don’t have to deal with Jason Statham shouting at his own ego in a lift for minutes that felt like days.

Anyway, from the moment the opening credits not so much kick in as explode onto the screen – up there with Seven, Catch Me If You Can, and The Incredibles, in recent years – it’s clear Ritchie means business. He must know what dogs his last two movies were, he must know he won’t get too many more chances, but despite that, there’s a bravura confidence to this I wasn’t expecting. In the first five minutes we meet about a thousand characters, and if it wasn’t for Mark Strong’s splendidly laconic voiceover you’d be utterly lost. Even with it you’re struggling, but who cares? The camera’s flying around, the performances are mostly spot-on, the music kills.

The plot is basically about upstart oligarch Russians taking over London properties from the old-school likes of Lenny Cole, played by the reliably superb Tom Wilkinson. He’s having an extraordinary run right now, and this is a nice addition to the canon. His consigliere is the cool-as-all-shit Mark Strong, and the pair of them rock together. Lenny is owed a serious amount of money – I couldn’t tell you how much, not having understood the mockney slang – by a bunch of would-be gangsters, led by Gerard Butler’s One-Two, and it’s their attempts to get that money, inadvertently sabotaging Lenny’s deals with the Russian mogul every time, that form the central spine of the movie.

But like I said, there are any number of other spin-off storylines and characters, including various junkies, thieves, gangsters, pop stars, music promoters (the slightly underused Ludacris and Jeremy Piven), and a scheming accountant, played with drawling deadpan sexiness by Thandie Newton. While not even Guy Ritchie’s agent would argue that he can write good parts for women – anyone remember a female character in Lock Stock? Or Snatch? And then there’s Swept Away, which makes you glad there weren’t any women in the others – at least here the single note he gives Newton to play is a good one, and she seems to be having a fine old time.

As do all the others. Gerard Butler finds a nice line in self-mockery; he and Newton have a spectacularly uncool dancing scene together that drew howls of laughter from the audience. He’s kind of a dork, and all the cooler for it. Also in his crew are Idris Elba and Tom Hardy, whose romantic yearnings form the basis for some of the best jokes in the movie.

But the standout performance, the one that really makes you feel you’re watching a new star beginning to shine, is that of Toby Kebbell. He made a good impression in the magnificent Dead Man’s Shoes, and I remember him in Control, but not a lot else. In fact, nothing else. But here, as the dissolute rock star Johnny Quid, he just fucking blazes. Women will want to do him (my girlfriend was stuck to her seat), men will want to be him; basically, the world is his to own.

Or it would be, if Ritchie didn’t have it in his pocket already. Reannouncing himself as a superb director both of set-pieces – a STUNNING chase scene where Butler is pursued by two Russian heavies who absolutely will not stop – and pure comedy – the aforementioned dance scene, the shortest sex scene in the world, and many more - Ritchie is on top form here. And as a writer, he’s having fun again. There’s no Kabbalahian subtext to distract, annoy or confuse. There’s just a cool story to tell, and a party to be had telling it.

It’s not a perfect film. A couple of the performances don’t really work, and occasionally it loses itself in needless exposition, as if it doesn’t realise what a good time we’re having in our ignorance. But basically it fucking pegs along, looking great and sounding even better, until the cool and genuinely surprising twist in the tail. And then, in typically confident style, the film ends by announcing that a sequel will be coming soon, which is a) good news and b) a flat-out ballsy move considering that this one hasn’t even opened yet. But judging from the audience response throughout, and the applause at the end, the sequel will be coming, and I’ll see you there.

Let the mistrust begin. For a few months. Then you’ll see it, and know I was right.

---

wow gerard butler in un film di ritchie .... sulla carta non gli darei niente...
Ma spero ne tiri fuori il meglio!